Tracking Changes

Overview

Teaching: 20 min
Exercises: 0 min

Questions

• How do I track the changes I make to files using Git?

Objectives

• Go through the modify-add-commit cycle for one or more files.

• Describe where changes are stored at each stage in the modify-add-commit cycle.

Add to Version Control

We’ve got a repository now containing a few pre-existing files - so let’s add one more. You might remember seeing GitHub suggest we added a README.md to let people know what our code is about, so let’s do that on the command line. We’ll use the text editor nano, as:

$ nano README.md

Then type an example description:

# Climate Analysis Toolkit

This is a set of python scripts designed to analyse climate datafiles.

We can save our file using Control-O (Control and O at the same time), then Enter, and quit out of nano using Control-X. Our description is a bit brief, but it’s enough for now! Let’s try git status again:

$ git status

On branch main
Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/main'.

Untracked files:
  (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
	README.md

nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)

Now, whilst our current snapshot of the repository is up-to-date, we’ve added a new file that we’re not tracking yet. We can tell Git to track the file we’ve just created using git add:

$ git add README.md

and then check that the right thing happened:

$ git status

On branch main
Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/main'.

Changes to be committed:
  (use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
	new file:   README.md

Git now knows that it’s supposed to keep track of README.md, just like climate_analysis.py and temp_conversion.py but it hasn’t recorded that as a commit yet. We dont have a snapshot of the repository with all the existing files and README.md.

Initial Commit

To get it to do that, we need to run one more command:

$ git commit -m "Added a basic readme file."

We use the -m flag (for “message”) to record a short, descriptive comment that will help us remember later on what we did and why.

If we just run git commit without the -m option, Git will launch nano (or whatever other editor we configured at the start) so that we can write a longer message.

Good commit messages start with a brief (<50 characters) summary of changes made in the commit, NOT “Bug Fixes” or “Changes”!

If you want to go into more detail, add a blank line between the summary line and your additional notes.

[main fa90884] Added a basic readme file.
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 README.md

When we run git commit, Git takes everything we have told it to save by using git add and stores a copy permanently inside the special .git directory. This permanent copy is called a revision and its short identifier is a10bd8f. (Your revision will have different identifier.)

If we run git status now:

$ git status

On branch main
Your branch is ahead of 'origin/main' by 1 commit.
  (use "git push" to publish your local commits)

nothing to commit, working tree clean

it tells us our local repository is up-to-date, although now we have edits to it that the remote version of it doesn’t (we’ll get to that later!).

Git has a special staging area where it keeps track of things that have been added to the current change set but not yet committed. git add puts things in this area, and git commit then copies them to long-term storage (as a commit)

What’s The Point of the Staging Area?

Why do we have this two-stage process, where we add files to the staging area, then create a commit from them?

Among other reasons, it allows you to easily bundle together a lot of changes in one go. If you changed the name of a variable used in multiple files (e.g. from t to temperature), you’d need to change it in all your files in one go in order for it to make sense. If you stored a copy of each file one-by-one you’d end up with a lot of versions of the code that didn’t work - variables with different names everywhere. The staging area lets you bundle together all those small changes that don’t work in isolation into one big change that’s coherent.

Review the Log

If we want to know what we’ve done recently, we can ask Git to show us the project’s history using git log:

$ git log

commit fa90884ca03dcefb97e415a374ac1aacaaa94c91 (HEAD -> main)
Author: Sam Mangham <mangham@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed Mar 16 15:22:29 2022 +0000

    Added a basic readme file.

commit 499b6d18b36a25d3f5ab9be1b708ea48fef1dd65 (origin/main, origin/HEAD)
Author: Sam Mangham <mangham@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed Mar 16 14:19:13 2022 +0000

    Initial commit

git log lists all revisions committed to a repository in reverse chronological order (most recent at the top).

The listing for each revision includes

• the revision’s full identifier (which starts with the same characters as the short identifier printed by the git commit command earlier),
• the branch it was created on (including whether or not it’s up-to-date with any remote versions of that branch),
• the revision’s author,
• when it was created,
• the log message Git was given when the revision was committed.

Modify a file (1)

Now suppose we modify an existing file, for example by adding a Docstring to the top of one of the files:

$ nano climate_analysis.py

""" Climate Analysis Tools """

When we run git status now, it tells us that a file it already knows about has been modified:

$ git status

On branch main
Your branch is ahead of 'origin/main' by 1 commit.
  (use "git push" to publish your local commits)

Changes not staged for commit:
  (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
  (use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
	modified:   climate_analysis.py

no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")

The last line is the key phrase: “no changes added to commit”.

So, while we have changed this file, but we haven’t told Git we will want to save those changes (which we do with git add) much less actually saved them (which we do with git commit).

It’s important to remember that git only stores changes when you make a commit

Review Changes and Commit

It is good practice to always review our changes before saving them. We do this using git diff. This shows us the differences between the current state of the file and the most recently commited version:

$ git diff

diff --git a/climate_analysis.py b/climate_analysis.py
index 277d6c7..d5b442d 100644
--- a/climate_analysis.py
+++ b/climate_analysis.py
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+""" Climate Analysis Tools """
 import sys
 import temp_conversion
 import signal

Windows users note

No newline at end of file This message is displayed because otherwise there is no way to tell the difference between a file where there is a newline at the end and one where is not. Diff has to output a newline anyway, or the result would be harder to read or process automatically. This can safely be ignored, but you can avoid seeing it by leaving a blank line at the end of your file.

The output is cryptic because it is actually a series of commands for tools like editors and patch telling them how to reconstruct one file given the other.

The key things to note are:

1. Line 1: The files that are being compared (a/ and b/ are labels, not paths)
2. Line 2: The two hex strings on the second line which parts of the hashes of the files being compares
3. Line 5: The lines that have changed. (It’s complex)
4. Below that, the changes - note the ‘+’ marker which shows an addtion

After reviewing our change, it’s time to commit it:

$ git commit -m "Add Docstring"

On branch main
Your branch is ahead of 'origin/main' by 1 commit.
  (use "git push" to publish your local commits)

Changes not staged for commit:
  (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
  (use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
	modified:   climate_analysis.py

no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")

Whoops: Git won’t commit because we didn’t use git add first. Let’s fix that:

$ git add climate_analysis.py
$ git commit -m "Add Docstring"

[main 55d3f56] Add Docstring
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Git insists that we add files to the set we want to commit before actually committing anything because we may not want to commit everything at once.

For example, suppose we might have fixed a bug in some existing code, but we might have added new code that’s not ready to share.

One more addition

What if we’ve made some edits, added them, and then forgotten what they were? Let’s add another line to the end of the file:

$ nano climate_analysis.py

# TODO(smangham): Add call to process rainfall

Check what’s changed with diff:

$ git diff

diff --git a/climate_analysis.py b/climate_analysis.py
index d5b442d..6f8ed8a 100644
--- a/climate_analysis.py
+++ b/climate_analysis.py
@@ -26,3 +26,5 @@ for line in climate_data:
             kelvin = temp_conversion.fahr_to_kelvin(fahr)
 
             print(str(celsius)+", "+str(kelvin))
+
+# TODO(smangham): Add call to process rainfall

So far, so good: we’ve added one line to the end of the file (shown with a + in the first column).

Now let’s put that change in the staging area (or add it to the change set), then go away for the weekend. When we come back, we can’t remember what we added, so we see what git diff reports:

$ git add climate_analysis.py
$ git diff

There is no output:

git diff shows us the differences between the working copy and what’s been added to the change set in staging area.

However, if we do this:

$ git diff --staged

diff --git a/climate_analysis.py b/climate_analysis.py
index d5b442d..6f8ed8a 100644
--- a/climate_analysis.py
+++ b/climate_analysis.py
@@ -26,3 +26,5 @@ for line in climate_data:
             kelvin = temp_conversion.fahr_to_kelvin(fahr)
 
             print(str(celsius)+", "+str(kelvin))
+
+# TODO(smangham): Add call to process rainfall

it shows us the difference between the last committed change and what’s in the staging area.

Let’s commit our changes:

$ git commit -m "Add rainfall processing placeholder"

[main 6f60ad6] Add rainfall processing placeholder
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

check our status:

$ git status

On branch main
Your branch is ahead of 'origin/main' by 3 commits.
  (use "git push" to publish your local commits)

nothing to commit, working tree clean

and now look at the history of what we’ve done so far:

$ git log

commit 6f60ad638f344fbb5fdf81f05a804f7417984eec (HEAD -> main)
Author: Sam Mangham <mangham@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed Mar 16 15:40:30 2022 +0000

    Add rainfall processing placeholder

commit 55d3f56c9f2d42919ffaff4fbaabd69fe99053eb
Author: Sam Mangham <mangham@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed Mar 16 15:35:42 2022 +0000

    Add Docstring

commit fa90884ca03dcefb97e415a374ac1aacaaa94c91
Author: Sam Mangham <mangham@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed Mar 16 15:22:29 2022 +0000

    Added a basic readme file.

commit 499b6d18b36a25d3f5ab9be1b708ea48fef1dd65 (origin/main, origin/HEAD)
Author: Sam Mangham <mangham@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed Mar 16 14:19:13 2022 +0000

    Initial commit

To recap, when we want to add changes to our repository, we first need to add the changed files to the staging area (git add) and then commit the staged changes to the repository (git commit).

Key Points

• git status shows the status of a repository.

• Files can be stored in a project’s working directory (which users see), the staging area (where the next commit is being built up) and the local repository (where commits are permanently recorded).

• git add puts files in the staging area.

• git commit saves the staged content as a new commit in the local repository.

• Write commit messages that accurately describe your changes.

• git log lists the commits made to the local repository.